Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 42% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	2.99% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	85.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium Silver J5005 2,202 User benchmarks, average bench 40% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	43.3% Average	Memory 46.2 1-Core 60.9 2-Core 118 43% 75 Pts	4-Core 234 8-Core 230 31% 232 Pts	64-Core 233 14% 233 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 43.3% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 605 14,651 User benchmarks, average bench 2% ASRock(1849 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 25.20.100.6444 Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	2.99% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 5.12 Parallax 3.69 3% 4.33 fps	MRender 5.14 Gravity 3.87 Splatting 0.09 2% 3.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.99% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial MX200 250GB-$134 26,364 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 183GB free (System drive) Firmware: MU01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 399 375 318 294 290 293 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Read 403 Write 397 Mixed 324 SusWrite 328 82% 363 MB/s	4K Read 26.8 4K Write 64.2 4K Mixed 35.3 120% 42.1 MB/s	DQ Read 273 DQ Write 255 DQ Mixed 244 188% 257 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba 18ASF1G72PDZ-2G3B1 2x4GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	28.8% Poor	MC Read 11.8 MC Write 9.8 MC Mixed 12.1 32% 11.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.8 SC Write 4.8 SC Mixed 4 11% 3.87 GB/s	Latency 175 23% 175 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.8% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium Silver J5005IntelBench 40%, 2,202 samples	19x

GPU
UHD Graphics 605IntelBench 2%, 14,651 samples	17x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	2x

SSD
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	3x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x
Sata III 120GBIntensoBench 68%, 2,648 samples	2x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 2400 C14 1x8GBToshibaBench 24%, 16 samples	3x
SODIM DDR4 2133 C15 1x8GBCorsairBench 39%, 629 samples	2x
F4 DDR4 2666 C19 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 1,403 samples	2x

Value: 18% - Very poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16