Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 56% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20170901
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 09 '18 at 16:57
Run Duration	236 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	15%

Watch Gameplay: Vega-56 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	85.2% Excellent	Memory 83.2 1-Core 117 2-Core 234 81% 145 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 830 78% 649 Pts	64-Core 1,286 80% 1,286 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 85.2% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX Vega-56-$170 92,053 User benchmarks, average bench 78% Sapphire(1DA2 E37F) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1652 MHz, MLim: 915 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.12.1.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	58.6% Above average	Lighting 66.5 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 62.1 54% 68.5 fps	MRender 91.8 Gravity 66.7 Splatting 86.5 67% 81.7 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 85%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 25GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,038 Write 1,623 Mixed 649 316% 1,436 MB/s	4K Read 47.4 4K Write 200 4K Mixed 64.4 260% 104 MB/s	DQ Read 1,063 DQ Write 1,064 DQ Mixed 1,054 794% 1,060 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 1GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 364 Write 250 Mixed 242 63% 285 MB/s	4K Read 24.3 4K Write 82.6 4K Mixed 40.4 132% 49.1 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 226 DQ Mixed 190 149% 205 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 85%
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 27GB free Firmware: 608ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 125 148 175 170 179 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	Read 326 Write 258 Mixed 264 SusWrite 158 56% 251 MB/s	4K Read 31 4K Write 77.7 4K Mixed 41.5 141% 50.1 MB/s	DQ Read 210 DQ Write 248 DQ Mixed 154 137% 204 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 85%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 8GB free Firmware: MU01 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 504 Write 370 Mixed 343 90% 406 MB/s	4K Read 26.7 4K Write 75.1 4K Mixed 38.2 129% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 311 DQ Mixed 196 174% 259 MB/s
Poor: 59% Great: 103%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 5GB free Firmware: CC41 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 93 94 94 93 95 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.9% Above average	Read 104 Write 31.7 Mixed 60 SusWrite 93.9 54% 72.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 134% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 255GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 142 131 126 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Read 139 Write 27 Mixed 71.5 SusWrite 137 69% 93.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 127% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 90GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 90 90 90 91 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	45.8% Average	Read 69.8 Write 69 Mixed 58.5 SusWrite 89.4 53% 71.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.9 166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 45.8% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 196GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 129 129 128 128 129 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	71.8% Very good	Read 122 Write 67 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 129 72% 97.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 71.8% Great: 112%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 141GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 86 87 87 87 88 88 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	50.2% Above average	Read 87.3 Write 84.5 Mixed 59.3 SusWrite 87.2 59% 79.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.9 180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 50.2% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x4GB 1,820 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 39.5 MC Mixed 36.1 112% 39.1 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 40.5 SC Mixed 29.9 90% 31.5 GB/s	Latency 74.8 53% 74.8 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 523 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	28x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	20x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $37
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)