Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics35.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive116% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
MotherboardGigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 10:30
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$185
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
78% Very good
Memory 77.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 220
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 423
8-Core 818
74% 621 Pts
64-Core 1,161
72% 1,161 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 78%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
35.3% Below average
Lighting 45.8
Reflection 44
Parallax 39.3
37% 43.1 fps
MRender 39.4
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 36
31% 38.5 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
113GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 314 314 313 314 311 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 504
Write 490
Mixed 402
SusWrite 329
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 43.9
4K Write 94.2
4K Mixed 57
189% 65 MB/s
DQ Read 383
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 358
272% 367 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 116%
Great: 124%
Samsung HD080HJ/P 80GB-$25
4GB free
Firmware: ZH100-34
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 34 33 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
19.4% Very poor
Read 33.5
Write 38
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 33.7
25% 33.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
139% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.4%
Great: 33%
Fujitsu MJA2500BH G2 500GB
339GB free
Firmware: 00000018
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 75 84 85 78 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 84.3
Write 71.2
Mixed 35.8
SusWrite 77.9
49% 67.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$43
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
80.9% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 27.1
83% 29.2 GB/s
SC Read 21.5
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 86.2
46% 86.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,620 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 82%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $673
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback