Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics37% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive81.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A75-UD4H  (all builds)
Memory13.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111102
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 07:25
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-3870 APU-$81
Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 47
2-Core 94.3
46% 72.2 Pts
4-Core 185
8-Core 179
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 186
12% 186 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 56%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.5.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
37% Below average
Lighting 48.4
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 59.6
39% 46.8 fps
MRender 30.4
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 39.9
32% 39.1 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 37%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 309 282 281 291 290 279 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Read 439
Write 408
Mixed 341
SusWrite 289
83% 369 MB/s
4K Read 24.5
4K Write 66.7
4K Mixed 31.1
112% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 271
203% 271 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 124%
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$28
212GB free
Firmware: Z32080RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 96 115 110 101 115 MB/s
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.5% Below average
Read 197
Write 136
Mixed 193
SusWrite 111
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 32.8
4K Mixed 13.5
59% 20.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 95.4
DQ Mixed 28.5
50% 99.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 86%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
683GB free
Firmware: AX001C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 101 102 102 102 102 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
57.3% Above average
Read 98.9
Write 97.4
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 101
60% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
115% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 57.3%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31
111GB free
Firmware: HP13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 115 118 116 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Read 177
Write 129
Mixed 81.4
SusWrite 116
92% 126 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.1
188% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37.5% Below average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.8
39% 13.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 9.3
21% 7.27 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 37.5%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A75-UD4H Builds (Compare 21 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A75-UD4H

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $109
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback