Acer Aspire M3400

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics54.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemAcer Aspire M3400  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire M3400
Memory10.6 GB free of 14 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100421
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 09 '18 at 00:48
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1035T
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Memory 79.5
1-Core 42.3
2-Core 82.5
45% 68.1 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 221
23% 186 Pts
64-Core 225
14% 225 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Asus(1043 85B9) 3GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
54.9% Above average
Lighting 67.1
Reflection 69.2
Parallax 58.8
55% 65 fps
MRender 69.2
Gravity 65.8
Splatting 68
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 54.9%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Green 1.5TB (2009)-$150
479GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 53 52 52 53 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
29.4% Poor
Read 49.8
Write 48.5
Mixed 40.7
SusWrite 52.3
35% 47.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 55%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65
371GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 44 39 49 51 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
32.1% Below average
Read 66.7
Write 63.5
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 44.8
42% 56.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 57%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 152 150 151 151 152 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 151
Write 125
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 151
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-037.A00LF None GU512303EP0202 None GU512303EP0202 None GU512303EP0202 14GB
667, 667, 667, 667 MHz
8192, 2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
27.8% Poor
MC Read 11.9
MC Write 6.4
MC Mixed 9.8
27% 9.37 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 7.8
18% 6.33 GB/s
Latency 81.5
49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire M3400 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire M3400

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback