Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 12.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Asus VivoBook 12_ASUS Laptop E203MA_E203MA (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E203MA
Memory	0.6 GB free of 2 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180326
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '18 at 03:29
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	JPN-User
Background CPU	20%

PC Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N4000 14,024 User benchmarks, average bench 24% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Memory 11.1 1-Core 40.8 2-Core 67.9 21% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 80.5 8-Core 84.7 11% 82.6 Pts	64-Core 85.2 5% 85.2 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 11F1) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4936 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.98% Terrible	Lighting 1.97 Reflection 3.04 Parallax 1.97 2% 2.32 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 1.7 Splatting 4.39 3% 3.17 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.98% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 693 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 798GB free, PID b200 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 79 79 84 79 74 MB/s Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	32.9% Below average	Read 51.5 Write 41.9 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 79.8 68% 49.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 0.2 97% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 52%
SDHC Card 16GB 1,063 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 15GB free, PID 6366 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 10 11 11 11 10 MB/s Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	8.21% Terrible	Read 17.4 Write 5.2 Mixed 10.3 SusWrite 10.6 13% 10.9 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.8 67% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.21% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 2x1GB 341 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 2 of 4 slots used 2GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	12% Very poor	MC Read 3.9 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 3.2 13% 4.47 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 1.2 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 393 10% 393 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 30%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16