Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	84.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1220 v5 1,202 User benchmarks, average bench 73% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	76.9% Very good	Memory 82.6 1-Core 107 2-Core 206 75% 132 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 383 54% 400 Pts	64-Core 375 23% 375 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 76.9% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M2000 5,678 User benchmarks, average bench 21% Nvidia(10DE 1190) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1651 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 390.77 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	15.5% Very poor	Lighting 14.8 Reflection 28.2 Parallax 27.3 12% 23.4 fps	MRender 25.6 Gravity 28 Splatting 27.5 22% 27 fps
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 15.5% Great: 22%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsun MZ7LN512HMJP-000 512GB 62 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 79GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAV02L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 400 87 87 92 88 80 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	84.1% Excellent	Read 477 Write 446 Mixed 360 SusWrite 139 80% 355 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 69.1 4K Mixed 41.7 140% 47.9 MB/s	DQ Read 277 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 70.1 114% 218 MB/s
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.1% Great: 120%
PNY CS1311 240GB-$78 26,547 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 20GB free Firmware: CS131122 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 484 Write 431 Mixed 346 94% 420 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 61.3 4K Mixed 32 75% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 2.6 DQ Write 16.4 DQ Mixed 3.5 4% 7.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 97%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M391A2K43BB1-CPB 2x16GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	75.1% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 25.5 77% 27 GB/s	SC Read 15.1 SC Write 27.8 SC Mixed 21.9 62% 21.6 GB/s	Latency 75.9 53% 75.9 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 75.1% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16