Performance Results


Gaming 14% Tree trunk	Desktop 56% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	58.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	68.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Http://www.abit.com.tw/ F-I90HD (ATI RS600-SB600) (all builds)
Memory	3 GB free of 4 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20080521
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 07 '18 at 18:55
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing as expected (55^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 71.6 1-Core 34.7 2-Core 69.2 40% 58.5 Pts	4-Core 134 8-Core 133 18% 133 Pts	64-Core 133 8% 133 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3718) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 73.3 Parallax 63.9 59% 69.8 fps	MRender 69.8 Gravity 69.7 Splatting 71.1 58% 70.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 378GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 204 217 211 205 210 208 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	68.8% Good	Read 252 Write 225 Mixed 224 SusWrite 209 51% 228 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 53.8 4K Mixed 38.9 127% 41.7 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 128 DQ Mixed 137 103% 137 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 68.8% Great: 134%
Maxtor STM3250310AS 250GB 13,068 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 123GB free Firmware: 3.AAC SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 80 81 80 81 81 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.4% Average	Read 81.4 Write 48.6 Mixed 47.4 SusWrite 80.2 47% 64.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 53%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM Performing below potential (31^st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.1% Very poor	MC Read 4.8 MC Write 2.9 MC Mixed 3.6 11% 3.77 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.2 SC Mixed 5.2 15% 5.23 GB/s	Latency 97.6 41% 97.6 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.1% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 42%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core2 Duo E8400Intel $89Bench 40%, 68,540 samples	4x
Core2 Duo E6850Intel $57Bench 40%, 4,150 samples	1x
Core2 Duo E7400Intel $130Bench 38%, 14,354 samples	1x

GPU
GeForce GT 630NvidiaBench 4%, 60,212 samples	3x
Radeon HD 2600-XTATIBench 2%, 1,081 samples	1x
HD 7750AMDBench 8%, 22,655 samples	1x

SSD
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	1x

RAM
4x1GBUnknownBench 18%, 54,972 samples	6x

Value: 45% - Average

Total price: $117

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16