Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (75th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 25 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive102% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 15:30
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (75th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$87
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
66.3% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 103
2-Core 196
69% 123 Pts
4-Core 339
8-Core 515
53% 427 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 550-$79
Sapphire(1DA2 E367) 2GB
CLim: 1206 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.2.1
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
17.9% Very poor
Lighting 19
Reflection 31.8
Parallax 22.5
16% 24.4 fps
MRender 29.7
Gravity 15.7
Splatting 34.9
23% 26.8 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 17.9%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
146GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 285 279 276 272 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 494
Write 480
Mixed 401
SusWrite 298
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 84
4K Mixed 50.9
171% 58.4 MB/s
DQ Read 240
DQ Write 227
DQ Mixed 247
182% 238 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 102%
Great: 124%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139
311GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 71 71 72 72 71 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
40.5% Average
Read 69.9
Write 70.2
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 70.9
52% 69.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 40.5%
Great: 59%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 8GB
2GB free, PID a81d
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.8 9.5 10 11 10 10 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
9.03% Terrible
Read 35.5
Write 5.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 9.6
15% 14.8 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
28% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 9.03%
Great: 9%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 1GB
0GB free, PID 1603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 4.2 4.2 4.3 4.3 4.2 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.34% Terrible
Read 18
Write 3.7
Mixed 5.2
SusWrite 4.2
8% 7.78 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
29% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.34%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot PSD48G240082 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.7 GB/s
SC Read 16
SC Write 17.1
SC Mixed 16.6
47% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,049 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $352
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback