| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 46.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| System | Intel Thurley |
| Motherboard | Koloe X58 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.9 GB free of 8.00098 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170331 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 07 '18 at 15:11 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | ITA-User |
| Background CPU | 10% |
PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.1%
Good
|
61% 95.5 Pts
|
35% 285 Pts
|
22% 353 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
18% 19.5 fps
|
17% 21.4 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
INTENSO 512GB
453GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 71 72 74 73 74 MB/s
|
46.3%
Average
|
26% 119 MB/s
|
93% 30.5 MB/s
|
71% 112 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9
24GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8 9.6 12 12 12 12 MB/s
|
7.77%
Terrible
|
23% 18.6 MB/s
|
20% 1.8 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair CML8GX3M1A1600C10 MXIC 25L8005 41GB
1600, 33 MHz
8192, 33792 MB
|
34.9%
Below average
|
33% 11.5 GB/s
|
26% 9.1 GB/s
|
61% 65.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical X58 Builds (Compare 505 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Koloe X58
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Xeon X5650IntelBench 70%, 13,757 samples | 87x |
| Xeon X5660IntelBench 71%, 6,950 samples | 78x |
| Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples | 58x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 34x |
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 31x |
| RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 30x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 87% - Excellent | Total price: $87 |