Asus H97-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.7%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 6 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus H97-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20141009
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 15:05
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-4790K-$365
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.7% Excellent
SC Int 120
SC Float 120
SC Mixed 116
95% 119 Pts
QC Int 420
QC Float 402
QC Mixed 392
92% 405 Pts
MC Int 633
MC Float 671
MC Mixed 669
98% 658 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 81.7%
Great: 99%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 193
Write 263
Mixed 307
57% 254 MB/s
4K Read 40.1
4K Write 99.8
4K Mixed 50.3
178% 63.4 MB/s
DQ Read 362
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 226
203% 308 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 117%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$80
44GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 415 349 269 226 168 153 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 432
Write 386
Mixed 323
SusWrite 263
79% 351 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 62
214% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 370
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 351
265% 354 MB/s
Poor: 85%
This bench: 116%
Great: 134%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$64
359GB free
Firmware: MX4O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 135 138 137 136 137 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 130
Write 126
Mixed 23.2
SusWrite 137
75% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 109%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$72
316GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 75 78 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 72.3
Write 70.5
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 74.9
50% 67.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 87%
WD Elements 25A3 5TB
3.5TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 37 38 40 37 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 37.3
Write 37
Mixed 34.8
SusWrite 37.8
50% 36.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
139% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
58.7% Above average
MC Read 20.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 17.9
58% 20.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 20.3
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18 GB/s
Latency 63.9
63% 63.9 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 58.7%
Great: 73%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical H97-PLUS Builds (Compare 3,270 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 59%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus H97-PLUS - $656

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,298
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $360Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $78
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $148Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i5-8600K $259Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $110SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $750SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback