Asrock X470 Gaming K4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.9%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics22.4% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive118% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X470 Gaming K4  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181106
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 07 '18 at 14:50
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$160
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
SC Int 109
SC Float 119
SC Mixed 114
91% 114 Pts
QC Int 431
QC Float 471
QC Mixed 450
102% 451 Pts
MC Int 912
MC Float 944
MC Mixed 940
140% 932 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$210
CLim: 2151 MHz, MLim: 2252 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (60 fps cap detected)
22.4% Poor
Lighting 60
Reflection 60
Parallax 60
19% 60 fps
MRender 60
Gravity 60
Splatting 60
25% 60 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 77%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
84GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 250 244 243 242 243 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
118% Outstanding
Read 516
Write 494
Mixed 462
SusWrite 262
97% 433 MB/s
4K Read 47.4
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 61.9
207% 71.7 MB/s
DQ Read 391
DQ Write 364
DQ Mixed 372
281% 376 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 118%
Great: 128%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$63
643GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 165 162 165 169 167 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 193
Write 180
Mixed 113
SusWrite 165
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.2
241% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 103%
Great: 106%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
13GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9 4.8 4.7 4.7 4.7 4.7 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
9.78% Terrible
Read 23.5
Write 7.8
Mixed 5.8
SusWrite 5.4
12% 10.6 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 2.8
160% 3.47 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 9.78%
Great: 16%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$205
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 33.4
MC Mixed 29.8
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 22.6
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 26.5
78% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 123%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical X470 Gaming K4 Builds (Compare 607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 134%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X470 Gaming K4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $1,375
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $370Nvidia GTX 1070 $320Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $63
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $150Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $210Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $90
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $125SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $70G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $830SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $45Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $136SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback