Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 83% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	37.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	263% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	27.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '18 at 23:43
Run Duration	487 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110 392,253 User benchmarks, average bench 70% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	75.2% Very good	Memory 72.6 1-Core 102 2-Core 213 72% 129 Pts	4-Core 418 8-Core 644 66% 531 Pts	64-Core 888 55% 888 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 75.2% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	37.2% Below average	Lighting 48.6 Reflection 32.6 Parallax 39.9 40% 40.4 fps	MRender 38.6 Gravity 43.3 Splatting 38.1 33% 40 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.2% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Avant 500GB M.2 NVME 500GB 311 User benchmarks, average bench 259% 338GB free (System drive) Firmware: SVN105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1477 1528 1516 1541 1583 1559 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	263% Outstanding	Read 1,800 Write 1,387 Mixed 1,046 SusWrite 1534 323% 1,442 MB/s	4K Read 46.7 4K Write 105 4K Mixed 68.8 214% 73.5 MB/s	DQ Read 762 DQ Write 593 DQ Mixed 687 512% 681 MB/s
Poor: 155% ↑ This bench: 263% Great: 342%
HP S700 500GB-$60 12,813 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 151GB free Firmware: R0116B1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 430 204 98 23 67 12 MB/s Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	66.5% Good	Read 476 Write 416 Mixed 387 SusWrite 139 79% 355 MB/s	4K Read 21.7 4K Write 84 4K Mixed 17 99% 40.9 MB/s	DQ Read 111 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 23.6 76% 157 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 66.5% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC25 SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 169 172 170 168 172 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 164 Write 128 Mixed 77.9 SusWrite 170 99% 135 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 428GB free Firmware: CC4G SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 156 158 158 154 159 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	Read 151 Write 125 Mixed 83.8 SusWrite 156 95% 129 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.9 157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 112%
Seagate Expansion Desk 5TB 11,776 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 651GB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 166 179 175 170 176 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	65.6% Good	Read 72.2 Write 70.6 Mixed 41.8 SusWrite 155 62% 84.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 6.7 4K Mixed 0.5 196% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 65.6% Great: 87%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA200 2TB 50 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 673GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 182 183 179 183 181 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	71.6% Very good	Read 175 Write 169 Mixed 31.1 SusWrite 182 182% 139 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 74%
General UDisk 16GB 4,718 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 4GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.3 8.7 8.7 8.2 7.8 8.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	5.83% Terrible	Read 13.6 Write 6.3 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 8.4 10% 8.2 MB/s	4K Read 8.6 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 32% 2.87 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.83% Great: 9%
INTEL SS DSA2CW160G3 160GB 148GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 164 165 166 167 166 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	134% Outstanding	Read 200 Write 159 Mixed 152 SusWrite 166 225% 169 MB/s	4K Read 11.5 4K Write 21.6 4K Mixed 13.6 1,240% 15.6 MB/s	DQ Read 13.2 DQ Write 28.1 DQ Mixed 16 1,549% 19.1 MB/s

TOSHIBA HDWD120 2TB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 312GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 151 183 184 184 184 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	67.2% Good	Read 145 Write 141 Mixed 26.1 SusWrite 177 162% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 0.6 106% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 67.2% Great: 76%
WD My Book 1140 2TB 10,094 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 542GB free, PID 1140 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 69 82 82 83 82 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	35.6% Below average	Read 85.1 Write 90.3 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 80.2 107% 79 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 92% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.6% Great: 49%
USB Flash Memory 1GB 30 User benchmarks, average bench 3% 1GB free, PID 6534 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 4.6 4.5 4.5 4.5 4.5 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	3.8% Terrible	Read 9.5 Write 4.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.5 7% 5.7 MB/s	4K Read 6.1 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 23% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 3.8% Great: 4%
ST2000DM 001-1CH164 2TB 35 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 859GB free, PID 0551 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 147 172 171 171 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 161 Write 163 Mixed 79.7 SusWrite 167 191% 143 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.9 74% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 66%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 1GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 0GB free, PID a777 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4 4.2 4.1 4.2 4.2 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	4.79% Terrible	Read 15 Write 3.5 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.1 7% 6.72 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 4.79% Great: 5%
JetFlash Transcend 2GB 787 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 6387 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.5 5.6 5.7 5.7 5.7 5.6 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	5.64% Terrible	Read 18.6 Write 5 Mixed 4.8 SusWrite 5.6 9% 8.5 MB/s	4K Read 7.3 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.64% Great: 6%
Patriot Memory 64GB 219 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 51GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 2.9 2.9 3 2.9 2.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	2.69% Terrible	Read 7 Write 2 Mixed 1.8 SusWrite 2.8 4% 3.4 MB/s	4K Read 4.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 17% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 2.69% Great: 9%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE641 3TB 28 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 584GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.8 1.8 1.3 0.8 0.8 0.8 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	Read 98.7 Write 113 Mixed 66.2 SusWrite 1 89% 69.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 94% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 60%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 32GB 34,316 User benchmarks, average bench 12% 5GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 3.2 4.1 5.1 3.9 4.2 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 21.8 Write 3.8 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 4.2 8% 8.52 MB/s	4K Read 9.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 3.4 216% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 18%
TOSHIBA DT01ACA050 500GB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 465GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 152 183 185 184 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	71.5% Very good	Read 180 Write 178 Mixed 39 SusWrite 178 189% 144 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.5 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 69%
IS817 innostor 2GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 2GB free, PID 0817 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	3.11% Terrible	Read 9 Write 4.8 Mixed 6.3 SusWrite 4.8 8% 6.23 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0 10% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.11% Great: 7%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 1GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 4% 1GB free, PID 0005 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 5.8 5.8 5.8 5.7 5.8 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	4.44% Terrible	Read 11.5 Write 4.3 Mixed 4.3 SusWrite 5.7 8% 6.45 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 24% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.44% Great: 5%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 4x8GB 306 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	92.7% Outstanding	MC Read 37.2 MC Write 34.5 MC Mixed 31.4 98% 34.4 GB/s	SC Read 17.1 SC Write 32 SC Mixed 27.6 73% 25.6 GB/s	Latency 95.5 42% 95.5 ns
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 92.7% Great: 146%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)