Asus H87M-E

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 27% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	40% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	62.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus H87M-E (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140807
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 06 '18 at 23:04
Run Duration	126 Seconds
Run User	HUN-User
Background CPU	16%

PC Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4570S 11,172 User benchmarks, average bench 66% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	74.3% Very good	Memory 85.7 1-Core 92.8 2-Core 196 72% 125 Pts	4-Core 364 8-Core 365 49% 365 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 74.3% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 770-$279 116,895 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Gigabyte(1458 3603) 2GB CLim: 1353 MHz, MLim: 1927 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 417.22 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	40% Below average	Lighting 47.7 Reflection 44.2 Parallax 62.8 39% 51.6 fps	MRender 61.1 Gravity 56.2 Splatting 41.3 42% 52.9 fps
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 36%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Fury 120GB-$160 11,403 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 63GB free (System drive) Firmware: BBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 97 99 92 89 94 MB/s Performing below potential (48^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	62.9% Good	Read 272 Write 124 Mixed 174 SusWrite 95.5 37% 166 MB/s	4K Read 26.2 4K Write 92.7 4K Mixed 35.4 134% 51.4 MB/s	DQ Read 94.7 DQ Write 127 DQ Mixed 103 80% 108 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 62.9% Great: 75%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 29GB free Firmware: 00E4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 73 72 75 74 74 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 88.3 Write 115 Mixed 66 SusWrite 73.5 63% 85.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 1.1 190% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 M378B5173BH0-CK0 16GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	59.9% Above average	MC Read 21.8 MC Write 22.9 MC Mixed 18.3 60% 21 GB/s	SC Read 15.6 SC Write 18.3 SC Mixed 19 50% 17.6 GB/s	Latency 71.4 56% 71.4 ns
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 59.9% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H87M-E Builds (Compare 852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 65%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H87M-E - $129

CPU
Core i7-4770Intel $75Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	195x
Core i5-4570Intel $62Bench 62%, 129,272 samples	128x
Core i5-4440Intel $128Bench 61%, 81,111 samples	76x

GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples	87x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	45x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	40x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	43x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	25x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	23x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	35x
HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBKingstonBench 56%, 28,461 samples	25x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 54%, 77,652 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $247

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16