TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z97 Anniversary

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics62.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive72.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock Z97 Anniversary  (all builds)
Memory13.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160527
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 06 '18 at 22:11
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4670-$52
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 95
1-Core 109
2-Core 218
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 394
8-Core 418
54% 406 Pts
64-Core 408
25% 408 Pts
Poor: 47% ↑
This bench: 81.9%
 Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3160)
CLim: 1655 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.22
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
62.2% Good
Lighting 77.8
Reflection 81.2
Parallax 72.1
63% 77.1 fps
MRender 84.4
Gravity 73.3
Splatting 64.9
60% 74.2 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 62.2%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36
46GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 276 55 55 56 56 55 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Read 504
Write 452
Mixed 400
SusWrite 92
81% 362 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 35.3
119% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 289
DQ Write 147
DQ Mixed 240
172% 225 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑
This bench: 72.4%
 Great: 91%
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$40
34GB free
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 212 210 212 192 154 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 459
Mixed 304
SusWrite 233
84% 373 MB/s
4K Read 36.8
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 49.8
185% 70.1 MB/s
DQ Read 350
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 249
211% 308 MB/s
Poor: 58% ↑
This bench: 106%
 Great: 101%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
22GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 47 47 48 47 47 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
26.6% Poor
Read 44.7
Write 37.5
Mixed 40
SusWrite 47.3
32% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑
This bench: 26.6%
 Great: 54%
Toshiba MQ01ABD075 750GB-$40
26GB free
Firmware: AX101U
SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 59 59 60 59 58 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 57.7
Write 50.7
Mixed 26
SusWrite 58.9
35% 48.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑
This bench: 33.5%
 Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB
147GB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 178 180 179 179 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 157
Write 155
Mixed 68.3
SusWrite 177
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 95.8%
 Great: 103%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
27GB free, PID a00c
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 55.5
Mixed 28.2
41% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS4G3D1609DS1S00. 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
64.2% Good
MC Read 22.7
MC Write 23.2
MC Mixed 20.3
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.2
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 20.5
55% 19.4 GB/s
Latency 57
70% 57 ns
Poor: 38% ↑
This bench: 64.2%
 Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z97 Anniversary Builds (Compare 1,182 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asrock Z97 Anniversary - $120

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples325x
Core i5-4690KIntel  $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples243x
Core i7-4790Intel  $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples112x
GPU
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples140x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples96x
GTX 960Nvidia  $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples77x
SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples56x
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples40x
RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples36x
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples36x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples29x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $768
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback