MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

Performance Results


Gaming 90% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 96% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B09
Motherboard	MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) (all builds)
Memory	22.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171218
Uptime	17.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 05 '18 at 08:53
Run Duration	311 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1920X-$800 10,440 User benchmarks, average bench 78% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	81.9% Excellent	Memory 84.2 1-Core 108 2-Core 215 77% 136 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 722 70% 575 Pts	64-Core 1,723 107% 1,723 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 81.9% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 376A) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2808 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	107% Outstanding	Lighting 138 Reflection 177 Parallax 155 112% 157 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 157 Splatting 110 102% 126 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 82GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,778 Write 1,540 Mixed 612 289% 1,310 MB/s	4K Read 38.2 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 55.3 186% 67 MB/s	DQ Read 949 DQ Write 684 DQ Mixed 679 545% 771 MB/s
Poor: 153% Great: 254%
OCZ ARC 100 240GB-$120 11,799 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 20GB free Firmware: 1.00 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 362 Write 369 Mixed 282 75% 338 MB/s	4K Read 23.2 4K Write 83.9 4K Mixed 32.7 122% 46.6 MB/s	DQ Read 285 DQ Write 317 DQ Mixed 232 194% 278 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 101%
Crucial BX100 250GB-$141 42,930 User benchmarks, average bench 87% 29GB free Firmware: MU02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 324 258 151 153 144 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	83.3% Excellent	Read 454 Write 325 Mixed 283 SusWrite 226 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 25.8 4K Write 78.7 4K Mixed 36.1 127% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 251 DQ Write 288 DQ Mixed 177 159% 239 MB/s
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.3% Great: 103%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 403GB free Firmware: 15.01H15 SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 141 139 143 139 142 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	69% Good	Read 100 Write 90.5 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 140 72% 98.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 109%
Samsung Spinpoint F3R 1TB 778 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 545GB free Firmware: 1AJ30002 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 105 105 105 105 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	57% Above average	Read 92 Write 23.5 Mixed 56.5 SusWrite 105 51% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 1 244% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 57% Great: 78%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 499GB 731 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 88GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 73 73 72 74 73 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	32.4% Below average	Read 40.7 Write 21.7 Mixed 29 SusWrite 72 30% 40.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 83% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 32.4% Great: 96%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 4TB 10,285 User benchmarks, average bench 78% 2.5TB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 157 150 147 146 147 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	89.7% Excellent	Read 161 Write 152 Mixed 62.2 SusWrite 150 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 5.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1.1 392% 2.93 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 89.7% Great: 110%
WD My Book 1230 4TB 14,665 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2.5TB free, PID 1230 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 124 124 124 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	48.8% Average	Read 112 Write 122 Mixed 78.3 SusWrite 124 149% 109 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 48.8% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C16 4x8GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	85.3% Excellent	MC Read 33.3 MC Write 28.3 MC Mixed 30.4 88% 30.7 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 24.4 73% 25.4 GB/s	Latency 73.1 55% 73.1 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.3% Great: 144%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09) Builds (Compare 262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

Motherboard: MSI X399 GAMING PRO CARBON AC (MS-7B09)

CPU
Ryzen TR 1950XAMD $225Bench 77%, 23,641 samples	123x
Ryzen TR 1920XAMD $800Bench 78%, 10,440 samples	43x
Ryzen TR 1900XAMD $110Bench 76%, 7,071 samples	37x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	38x
RTX 2080Nvidia $396Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	19x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	15x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	17x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	13x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $249Bench 279%, 18,356 samples	13x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBCorsairBench 96%, 10,311 samples	12x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	9x
TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 8x8GBUnknownBench 160%, 29 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $753

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16