PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 27.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 49.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 9GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 9GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P6X58D-E (all builds) |
Memory | 6.6 GB free of 9 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120806 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 04 '18 at 21:38 |
Run Duration | 571 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon X5675
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
|
71.3%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD HD 7950-$290
PwrHis(1787 2316) 3GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 215 89 37 36 MB/s
|
49.9%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
847GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0.2 108 105 MB/s
|
40.7%
Average
|
|||
Samsung HD105SI 1TB
929GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 0 101 100 MB/s
|
37.5%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 9GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 1024 MB
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples | 496x |
Core i7 930Intel $199Bench 64%, 19,497 samples | 198x |
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples | 145x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 74x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 74x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 67x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 69% - Good | Total price: $289 |