Intel CRESCENTBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.31% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive61.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel CRESCENTBAY  (all builds)
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150829
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 20:06
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5250U
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.6 GHz
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Memory 80.9
1-Core 60.2
2-Core 90.5
51% 77.2 Pts
4-Core 145
8-Core 159
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 205
13% 205 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 60%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Intel(8086 1626) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4963
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.31% Terrible
Lighting 9.63
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 12.8
8% 10.9 fps
MRender 8.43
Gravity 7.8
Splatting 15.6
9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.31%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
128GB 127GB
25GB free (System drive)
Firmware: O0918B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 209 192 223 207 215 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
61.7% Good
Read 341
Write 280
Mixed 208
SusWrite 211
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 37.3
4K Mixed 24.4
91% 29.3 MB/s
DQ Read 266
DQ Write 61.5
DQ Mixed 138
108% 155 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 107%
Samsung PM810 mSATA 128GB
16GB free
Firmware: AXM18D1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 129 42 32 34 34 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.7% Poor
Read 168
Write 152
Mixed 148
SusWrite 68.8
30% 134 MB/s
4K Read 14.3
4K Write 31.9
4K Mixed 12
54% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 79.9
DQ Write 37.7
DQ Mixed 16
23% 44.5 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.7%
Great: 43%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
28GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.1 10 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
7.49% Terrible
Read 17.3
Write 4.5
Mixed 8.3
SusWrite 10.4
12% 10.1 MB/s
4K Read 3.7
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1.1
72% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.49%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C11 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.2% Above average
MC Read 20.5
MC Write 22.9
MC Mixed 20.7
61% 21.4 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 15.6
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CRESCENTBAY Builds (Compare 193 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel CRESCENTBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback