Asus P7F-M WS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics21.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7F-M WS  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100629
Uptime11.9 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 19:26
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
63.8% Good
Memory 81.9
1-Core 60.9
2-Core 138
57% 93.7 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 336
37% 294 Pts
64-Core 334
21% 334 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD HD 7850-$174
PwrHis(1787 2320) 2GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 18.11.2
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
21.2% Poor
Lighting 25.7
Reflection 27.6
Parallax 30.6
21% 28 fps
MRender 24.3
Gravity 20.5
Splatting 32.2
22% 25.7 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 120GB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Q0831C0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 138 48 50 48 48 MB/s
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
43% Average
Read 238
Write 218
Mixed 57
SusWrite 91.5
34% 151 MB/s
4K Read 21.3
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 18.8
64% 18 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 27.9
64% 132 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 43%
Great: 83%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 2TB
325GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 42 40 43 39 40 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
31.5% Below average
Read 68
Write 13.2
Mixed 26.9
SusWrite 41.4
28% 37.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.8
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 24%
This bench: 31.5%
Great: 123%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 32GB
16GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.8 6.4 7.2 7.2 8.1 8.3 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
4.11% Terrible
Read 14.8
Write 11.8
Mixed 13.7
SusWrite 6.5
15% 11.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.11%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 32GB
800, 800, 800, 800 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
28.7% Poor
MC Read 9.7
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.9 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 10.9
SC Mixed 9.4
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 77.1
52% 77.1 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7F-M WS Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7F-M WS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 12% - Very poor Total price: $115
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback