Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics80.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
MotherboardGigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180830
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 17:54
Run Duration185 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 94.1
1-Core 156
2-Core 310
102% 187 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 1,181
106% 893 Pts
64-Core 1,158
72% 1,158 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 104%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.9% Excellent
Lighting 100
Reflection 111
Parallax 95.7
82% 102 fps
MRender 97.3
Gravity 94
Splatting 99.7
80% 97 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 194 74 73 67 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 501
Write 419
Mixed 369
SusWrite 145
80% 358 MB/s
4K Read 44.8
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 49.5
181% 62.6 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 154
124% 180 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
119GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 470 434 322 322 322 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
125% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 441
Mixed 417
SusWrite 386
98% 436 MB/s
4K Read 44.2
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 61.6
211% 76.5 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 339
DQ Mixed 355
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 125%
Great: 129%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
1.5TB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 89 97 98 89 85 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.8% Above average
Read 99.1
Write 94.2
Mixed 20.7
SusWrite 91.7
55% 76.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
149% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.8%
Great: 107%
WD WD4005FZBX-00K5WB0 4TB
825GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 171 164 171 167 169 169 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 230
Write 232
Mixed 106
SusWrite 168
135% 184 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 4.9
4K Mixed 1.8
362% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 115%
Great: 136%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1GB free
Firmware: 0707
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 62.9
Write 56.9
Mixed 70.1
48% 63.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.5
137% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 67%
HP Photosmart C4180 2GB
2GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 3.2 3.3 3.4 3.4 3.3 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
1.79% Terrible
Read 4
Write 3
Mixed 2.7
SusWrite 3.3
4% 3.25 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
8% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.79%
Great: 2%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
47.5% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.5
MC Mixed 13.6
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 14.9
43% 15 GB/s
Latency 59.6
67% 59.6 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 49%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $176

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 118% - Outstanding Total price: $773
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback