ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook E14 E402WAS

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Sail boat	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.58% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	14.6% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Asus VivoBook E14 E402WAS (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK E402WAS
Memory	2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170929
Uptime	1.6 Days
Run Date	Dec 04 '18 at 16:07
Run Duration	136 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E2-6110 APU R2 Graphics 1,037 User benchmarks, average bench 29% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Memory 50.3 1-Core 23.1 2-Core 46.4 27% 39.9 Pts	4-Core 89.6 8-Core 89.6 12% 89.6 Pts	64-Core 87.7 5% 87.7 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R2 Graphics 1,710 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1E50) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 17.5 Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	1.58% Terrible	Lighting 1.7 Reflection 3.81 Parallax 2.38 1% 2.63 fps	MRender 2.62 Gravity 1.47 Splatting 2.87 2% 2.32 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.58% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
BHT WR202I0032G E70245F5 31GB 178 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 15GB free (System drive) Firmware: 450100 SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 33 22 20 20 20 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	14.6% Very poor	Read 137 Write 58.2 Mixed 74.9 SusWrite 27 16% 74.2 MB/s	4K Read 6.5 4K Write 9.9 4K Mixed 6.1 23% 7.5 MB/s	DQ Read 8.8 DQ Write 11.7 DQ Mixed 7.9 7% 9.47 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.6% Great: 17%
Hitachi HTS545050A7E380 500GB 64,410 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 257GB free Firmware: GG2OA7A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 94 97 98 97 97 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	53.9% Above average	Read 91.6 Write 95.2 Mixed 32.8 SusWrite 96.2 57% 78.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 53.9% Great: 58%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5174EB0-YK0 1x4GB 545 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (90^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	17.4% Very poor	MC Read 7.2 MC Write 3.9 MC Mixed 6.3 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 4 SC Mixed 6 14% 5.07 GB/s	Latency 159 25% 159 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 17.4% Great: 18%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical VivoBook E14 E402WAS Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook E14 E402WAS

CPU
E2-6110 APU R2 GraphicsAMDBench 29%, 1,037 samples	13x

GPU
Radeon R2 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 1,710 samples	13x

SSD
WR202I0064G E70245F5 63GBBHTBench 13%, 562 samples	9x
RBUSC180DS37128GJ 128GBKingstonBench 55%, 109 samples	1x
Premier SP550 120GBAdata $45Bench 76%, 22,057 samples	1x

RAM
M471B5174EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 14%, 545 samples	8x
HMT451S6CFR6A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 20%, 5,898 samples	4x
HMT425S6CFR6A-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 13%, 20 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback