Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics19.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121101
Uptime2 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 09:39
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2300
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
64.3% Good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 153
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 237
8-Core 287
34% 262 Pts
64-Core 295
18% 295 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-Ti-$92
Nvidia(10DE 105F) 2GB
CLim: 1385 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
19.2% Very poor
Lighting 24.2
Reflection 17.8
Parallax 21.1
20% 21 fps
MRender 26.1
Gravity 24.6
Splatting 17.9
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 19.2%
Great: 19%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M5 Pro 128GB-$130
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 217 221 222 223 206 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
59.5% Above average
Read 314
Write 216
Mixed 212
SusWrite 217
54% 240 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 25.1
87% 28.9 MB/s
DQ Read 174
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 27.7
54% 110 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 59.5%
Great: 98%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB
711GB free
Firmware: 77.04D77
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
46.6% Average
Read 80.5
Write 79.3
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 81.7
55% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.6%
Great: 57%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 8GB
5GB free, PID 0732
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 12 12 12 12 12 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
13.6% Very poor
Read 64
Write 9.5
Mixed 6.8
SusWrite 12
22% 23.1 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
25% 2 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 13.6%
Great: 25%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (37th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49% Average
MC Read 16.8
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.5
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 14.3
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 49%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,491 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $15Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback