Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics76.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive42.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UP4  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140319
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 04 '18 at 04:07
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4820K-$110
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
66.4% Good
Memory 78.4
1-Core 95.4
2-Core 170
67% 115 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 392
44% 346 Pts
64-Core 378
23% 378 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 66.4%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.6% Very good
Lighting 94.7
Reflection 105
Parallax 91.4
77% 96.9 fps
MRender 88.7
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 96.7
76% 91.5 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
516GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 131 134 133 132 135 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.8% Average
Read 153
Write 178
Mixed 146
SusWrite 133
34% 152 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 40.5
4K Mixed 23.9
82% 28 MB/s
DQ Read 70.9
DQ Write 71.7
DQ Mixed 77.6
57% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 81%
This bench: 42.8%
Great: 133%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
128GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 121 127 126 126 128 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
52.7% Above average
Read 295
Write 198
Mixed 195
SusWrite 125
45% 203 MB/s
4K Read 23.2
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 25.3
93% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 107
DQ Write 104
DQ Mixed 99.1
76% 103 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 52.7%
Great: 124%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1.5TB free
Firmware: ABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 126 126 126 126 126 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
84.8% Excellent
Read 172
Write 187
Mixed 35.7
SusWrite 124
94% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.5
146% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR3 1866 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 26.7
MC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.5 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.1
27% 9.4 GB/s
Latency 83.6
48% 83.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UP4 Builds (Compare 897 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UP4 - $480

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $802
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback