| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 8.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks. |
| Boot Drive | 88.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (75%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asus P8P67-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit cores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20110830 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 04 '18 at 00:37 |
| Run Duration | 157 Seconds |
| Run User | BRA-User |
| Background CPU | 75% |
PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.4%
Very good
|
61% 95 Pts
|
44% 333 Pts
|
19% 310 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTS 450
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 783 MHz, MLim: 902 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13
|
8.1%
Terrible
|
8% 9.48 fps
|
9% 10.9 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 398 406 407 375 409 MB/s
|
88.2%
Excellent
|
95% 424 MB/s
|
107% 38.5 MB/s
|
100% 202 MB/s
|
|
Kingston DataTraveler 101 G2 USB 2.0 8GB-$6
7GB free, PID 1642
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.9 4.5 4.7 4.5 4.3 3.9 MB/s
|
2.21%
Terrible
|
7% 5.35 MB/s
|
3% 0.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
|
50.7%
Above average
|
50% 17.5 GB/s
|
43% 14.9 GB/s
|
56% 71.3 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8P67-M Builds (Compare 392 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M - $150
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 88x |
| Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 75x |
| Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 55x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 31x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 19x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 19x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 63% - Good | Total price: $573 |