Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte A320M-S2H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF  (all builds)
Memory9.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 17:04
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 68.4
1-Core 88.9
2-Core 190
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 419
52% 394 Pts
64-Core 319
20% 319 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 399.7
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
47.3% Average
Lighting 61.9
Reflection 53.4
Parallax 49.3
50% 54.9 fps
MRender 49.3
Gravity 49.6
Splatting 51.6
41% 50.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 473
Write 449
Mixed 304
91% 409 MB/s
4K Read 38.3
4K Write 85
4K Mixed 45.1
161% 56.1 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 107
149% 274 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$35
223GB free
Firmware: UF360000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 135 139 139 141 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 432
Write 348
Mixed 244
SusWrite 141
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 20.6
4K Write 37.9
4K Mixed 18.2
75% 25.6 MB/s
DQ Read 118
DQ Write 80.4
DQ Mixed 25.6
39% 74.6 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 55%
WDC WDS240G2G0B-00EPW0 240GB
223GB free
Firmware: UJ450000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 304 118 149 149 146 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (70th percentile)
47.8% Average
Read 430
Write 299
Mixed 255
SusWrite 168
64% 288 MB/s
4K Read 9.4
4K Write 31.8
4K Mixed 15.4
51% 18.9 MB/s
DQ Read 114
DQ Write 86
DQ Mixed 39.9
46% 80.1 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 47.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSEK.8FBD 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35.8
MC Mixed 30.6
95% 33.3 GB/s
SC Read 16.1
SC Write 29.3
SC Mixed 24.2
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 89%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-A320M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 7,634 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A320M-S2H-CF - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $428
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback