Toshiba SATELLITE L850-1LW

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.11% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
SystemToshiba SATELLITE L850-1LW  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel PLCSF8
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20131001
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateDec 03 '18 at 16:31
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3210M-$52
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
55.6% Above average
Memory 82.3
1-Core 83.2
2-Core 119
60% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 166
8-Core 190
23% 178 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 7670M
Toshiba(1179 FB31) 2GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 13.151.0.0
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
5.11% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 6.42
Parallax 5.28
5% 6.03 fps
MRender 5.67
Gravity 4.77
Splatting 7.09
5% 5.84 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.11%
Great: 5%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 750GB-$71
285GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 57 48 58 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
36.5% Below average
Read 73.5
Write 73.7
Mixed 38.5
SusWrite 53.3
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
110% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 36.5%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5173BH0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
54.6% Above average
MC Read 19.3
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 17.8
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 14.7
SC Mixed 16.1
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 76.4
52% 76.4 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 55%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback