HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 96% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 53% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	141% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

System	HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8437
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180906
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '18 at 04:03
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$200 349,567 User benchmarks, average bench 87% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	93.9% Outstanding	Memory 93.4 1-Core 135 2-Core 272 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 508 8-Core 808 81% 658 Pts	64-Core 1,135 70% 1,135 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 93.9% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119 627,793 User benchmarks, average bench 52% HP(103C 82FC) 3GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 398.82 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	55.5% Above average	Lighting 68.9 Reflection 68.3 Parallax 59.8 56% 65.6 fps	MRender 70.5 Gravity 64.5 Splatting 64.6 54% 66.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 55.5% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB 8,655 User benchmarks, average bench 176% 74GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB73H1Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 198 160 161 161 156 161 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	141% Outstanding	Read 849 Write 585 Mixed 477 SusWrite 166 115% 519 MB/s	4K Read 40.8 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 55.7 197% 72.4 MB/s	DQ Read 876 DQ Write 734 DQ Mixed 703 554% 771 MB/s
Poor: 101% ↑ This bench: 141% Great: 317%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 918GB free Firmware: MS2OA800 SusWrite @10s intervals: 189 183 183 185 188 192 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 196 Mixed 35.9 SusWrite 187 110% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 146% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GB 6,220 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	MC Read 32.8 MC Write 32 MC Mixed 22.9 84% 29.2 GB/s	SC Read 18.8 SC Write 30.6 SC Mixed 23.7 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 61.3 65% 61.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx Builds (Compare 2,941 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 73%

Battleship

Desktop 90%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p1xx

CPU
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples	1,240x
Core i7-8700KIntel $186Bench 88%, 746,287 samples	720x
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	588x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	737x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	357x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	290x

SSD
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBToshiba $33Bench 125%, 44,050 samples	354x
TOSHIBA 256GBKbg30zmv256gBench 99%, 31,797 samples	172x
XG5 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshiba $46Bench 145%, 33,719 samples	157x

RAM
8ATF1G64AZ-2G6H1 2x8GBMicronBench 77%, 6,220 samples	396x
HP26D4U9S8ME-8X 2x8GBKingstonBench 79%, 4,094 samples	220x
HMA81GU6CJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 80%, 9,970 samples	179x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 107% - Outstanding

Total price: $366

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16