| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 15.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 4 years ago.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20130715 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Dec 03 '18 at 01:18 |
| Run Duration | 375 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 19% |
PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
68.3%
Good
|
58% 94 Pts
|
41% 336 Pts
|
26% 415 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7770
Sapphire(174B E244) 1GB
CLim: 1100 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.9.3
|
15.9%
Very poor
|
16% 21.2 fps
|
15% 18 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
92.9%
Outstanding
|
84% 373 MB/s
|
160% 57.6 MB/s
|
48% 108 MB/s
|
|
WD easystore 25FC 2TB
168GB free, PID 25fc
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s
|
14.8%
Very poor
|
39% 29.4 MB/s
|
83% 0.93 MB/s
| |
|
SanDisk Extreme USB 3.0 16GB-$17
3GB free, PID 5580
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s
|
28.2%
Poor
|
36% 27 MB/s
|
356% 5.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 800 MHz
|
49.6%
Average
|
51% 17.8 GB/s
|
30% 10.4 GB/s
|
60% 66.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-990FXA-UD3 Builds (Compare 1,400 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-990FXA-UD3 - $100
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 570x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 210x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 74x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 66x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 61x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 71% - Very good | Total price: $440 |