Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 93% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 94% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	95.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180907
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '18 at 21:13
Run Duration	175 Seconds
Run User	IRL-User
Background CPU	13%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (88^th percentile)	79.8% Very good	Memory 75.3 1-Core 114 2-Core 223 76% 137 Pts	4-Core 452 8-Core 845 77% 648 Pts	64-Core 1,235 76% 1,235 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.8% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% EVGA(3842 6593) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	115% Outstanding	Lighting 147 Reflection 165 Parallax 139 120% 150 fps	MRender 124 Gravity 177 Splatting 125 115% 142 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB 25,072 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 89GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 116 84 90 93 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	95.7% Outstanding	Read 491 Write 453 Mixed 385 SusWrite 150 83% 370 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 86 4K Mixed 53.8 177% 60.3 MB/s	DQ Read 269 DQ Write 252 DQ Mixed 259 195% 260 MB/s
Poor: 79% ↑ This bench: 95.7% Great: 131%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48 144,544 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 511GB free Firmware: 01.01L01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 129 137 136 136 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	80.2% Excellent	Read 144 Write 135 Mixed 91.2 SusWrite 134 93% 126 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 1 202% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 80.2% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$31 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 810GB free Firmware: HP51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 190 179 195 192 194 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 193 Write 151 Mixed 73.7 SusWrite 190 111% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 112%
Samsung HM500JI 500GB-$100 8,795 User benchmarks, average bench 35% 124GB free Firmware: 2AC101C4 SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 37 36 37 40 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	22.5% Poor	Read 40.7 Write 14.5 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 37.6 22% 29.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.4 72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 22.5% Great: 47%
WD Elements 2TB 35,768 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 635GB free, PID 1048 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 79 80 74 78 78 79 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	30.2% Below average	Read 61 Write 62 Mixed 41 SusWrite 77.8 83% 60.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.7 73% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GB-$73 54,616 User benchmarks, average bench 98% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1200 MHz Performing below potential (14^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79% Very good	MC Read 31.6 MC Write 25.3 MC Mixed 28.5 81% 28.5 GB/s	SC Read 20.7 SC Write 28.4 SC Mixed 23.6 69% 24.2 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 129%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	417x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	215x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	160x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	122x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $847

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)