PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Motherboard | Asus A88XM-PLUS (all builds) |
Memory | 6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 7 |
BIOS Date | 20131029 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Dec 02 '18 at 19:02 |
Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 4% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
59.1%
Above average
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1481 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.1
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.3%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 112 106 114 114 96 MB/s
|
77.5%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda Green 1TB-$580
752GB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 124 123 124 124 124 122 MB/s
|
75.3%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.2%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
A10-7700K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMDBench 45%, 11,026 samples | 36x |
A10-7850K APU (2014 D.Ka)AMD $135Bench 45%, 19,875 samples | 33x |
Athlon II X4 860KAMD $51Bench 45%, 29,887 samples | 19x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 6%, 25,284 samples | 24x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
Radeon R7 GraphicsAMDBench 5%, 22,117 samples | 19x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 25% - Poor | Total price: $94 |