Gigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 54% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.37% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	63.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H (all builds)
Memory	5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20100809
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '16 at 11:12
Run Duration	225 Seconds
Run User	CZE-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (54^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% Socket M2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	58.4% Above average	Memory 87 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 101 52% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 174 8-Core 185 24% 180 Pts	64-Core 197 12% 197 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 58.4% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730 164,888 User benchmarks, average bench 5% Asus(1043 84DC) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6839 Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	3.37% Terrible	Lighting 4.2 Reflection 4.92 Parallax 1.12 3% 3.42 fps	MRender 4.81 Gravity 4.43 Splatting 3.09 3% 4.11 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.37% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V300 240GB-$35 176,713 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 161GB free (System drive) Firmware: 608A Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 95 95 31914847 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 60868276518937 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 23 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 9 (B1) Unknown 0 0 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 31 36 90196672543 (C2) HDA temperature 31 36 90196672543 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 31914847 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 31914847 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 31914847 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 85899345920 (E9) Unknown 0 0 360 (EA) Unknown 0 0 203 (F1) Unknown 0 0 203 (F2) Unknown 0 0 133 (F4) Unknown 100 100 262145	63.2% Good	Read 263 Write 223 Mixed 230 53% 238 MB/s	4K Read 31.6 4K Write 70.4 4K Mixed 20.9 112% 41 MB/s	DQ Read 139 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 49.4 61% 107 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 63.2% Great: 85%
Seagate ST3160023AS 160GB-$24 4,798 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 149GB free Firmware: 3.00 Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 54 45 66979059 (03) Spinup time 97 96 0 (04) Start/Stop count 96 96 4767 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 86 60 453914911 (09) Power-on hours count 88 88 10621 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 97 97 3648 (C2) HDA temperature 24 47 47244640280 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 54 45 66979059 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	29.1% Poor	Read 48.6 Write 52.6 Mixed 50.2 38% 50.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 1.32 4K Mixed 0.35 90% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 32%
Seagate ST360015A 60GB 79 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 56GB free Firmware: 3.33 Max speed: UDMA 100 100 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 67 52 194152341 (03) Spinup time 100 100 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 616 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 82 60 182003678 (09) Power-on hours count 85 85 13937 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 96 96 4244 (C2) HDA temperature 35 61 35 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 67 52 194152341 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 199 1 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 253 0	24.1% Poor	Read 42 Write 41.6 Mixed 36.2 30% 40 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.03 4K Mixed 0.32 76% 0.62 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 24.1% Great: 24%
Seagate Backup+ Desk 2TB 174 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 56GB free, PID a0a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	12.8% Very poor	Read 25.6 Write 27.3 Mixed 13.6 28% 22.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.48 4K Write 0.97 4K Mixed 0.19 41% 0.55 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12.8% Great: 63%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% null MHz 2048, 2048, 4096 MB Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	30.3% Below average	MC Read 12.6 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 9.7 28% 9.97 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 8.8 21% 7.47 GB/s	Latency 70.4 57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 30.3% Great: 51%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-MA78LMT-US2H Builds (Compare 40 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-MA78LMT-US2H

CPU
Athlon II X4 640AMD $70Bench 45%, 18,839 samples	11x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	6x
Athlon II X4 635AMDBench 45%, 5,306 samples	4x

GPU
Radeon 3000 GraphicsATIBench 1%, 21,841 samples	5x
GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples	3x
GeForce GT 240NvidiaBench 4%, 11,020 samples	2x

SSD
SSD Plus 240GBSanDisk $28Bench 61%, 133,640 samples	3x
850 Pro 256GBSamsung $125Bench 102%, 141,929 samples	2x
SSDPR-CX400-128-G2 128GBBench 70%, 718 samples	2x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	9x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	8x
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 52% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16