Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive94.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170831
Uptime10.1 Days
Run DateDec 02 '18 at 06:14
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$186
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
85% Excellent
Memory 89.6
1-Core 127
2-Core 257
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 432
8-Core 825
75% 629 Pts
64-Core 1,030
64% 1,030 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
36% Below average
Lighting 0.07
Reflection 181
Parallax 179
0% 120 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 164
Splatting 114
106% 131 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 36%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 47 106 57 63 69 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 572
Write 354
Mixed 270
SusWrite 86.6
71% 321 MB/s
4K Read 31
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 35.2
152% 59.8 MB/s
DQ Read 653
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 362
292% 422 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 144%
WD Blue SATA M.2 500GB-$100
82GB free
Firmware: X41110WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 279 298 251 267 185 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 475
Write 352
Mixed 302
SusWrite 264
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 33
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 45
164% 61.4 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 237
201% 295 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 100%
Great: 103%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
677GB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 149 147 144 150 148 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
94.1% Outstanding
Read 180
Write 184
Mixed 30
SusWrite 147
98% 135 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.6
157% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z RGB DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
64.7% Good
MC Read 25.1
MC Write 24.3
MC Mixed 19.8
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 19
50% 17.5 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,311 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING - $135

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $844
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback