Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	45.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 2 (all builds)
Memory	10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180803
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 02 '18 at 02:46
Run Duration	160 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7640X-$110 2,123 User benchmarks, average bench 84% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Memory 92.6 1-Core 137 2-Core 273 93% 167 Pts	4-Core 492 8-Core 527 67% 509 Pts	64-Core 528 33% 528 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 98%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 780-$329 50,279 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Asus(1043 8469) 3GB CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (63^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	45.3% Average	Lighting 54.7 Reflection 49.1 Parallax 63.6 45% 55.8 fps	MRender 65.7 Gravity 62.8 Splatting 46.7 47% 58.4 fps
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 45.3% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 425GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 377 376 420 387 393 441 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	86% Excellent	Read 305 Write 378 Mixed 230 SusWrite 399 74% 328 MB/s	4K Read 21.9 4K Write 100 4K Mixed 30.2 125% 50.8 MB/s	DQ Read 278 DQ Write 240 DQ Mixed 227 179% 248 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 86% Great: 134%
GOODRAM 240GB 8,481 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 35GB free Firmware: SAFM22.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 440 411 431 439 417 416 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 412 Write 426 Mixed 297 SusWrite 426 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 107 4K Mixed 39 149% 58 MB/s	DQ Read 264 DQ Write 350 DQ Mixed 162 163% 259 MB/s
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 102%
Toshiba MQ01ABF050 500GB-$32 118,349 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 138GB free Firmware: AM001J SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 40 31 32 28 41 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 34.1 Mixed 15.2 SusWrite 33.7 19% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.3 4K Mixed 0.1 25% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 15% Great: 60%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31 763,289 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 63GB free Firmware: MS2OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 111 111 109 107 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	56.6% Above average	Read 85.1 Write 86.9 Mixed 26 SusWrite 112 56% 77.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 56.6% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 2x8GB 7,608 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (26^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.4% Very good	MC Read 29.4 MC Write 31.4 MC Mixed 23.7 80% 28.2 GB/s	SC Read 17.7 SC Write 29.2 SC Mixed 23.2 67% 23.4 GB/s	Latency 63 64% 63 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 79.4% Great: 115%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,652 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 100%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 94%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

CPU
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	495x
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	260x
Core i7-7740XIntel $281Bench 87%, 5,094 samples	148x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	168x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	92x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	78x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	60x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	56x

RAM
DDR4 3000 2OZ 2x8GBAdataBench 87%, 25,457 samples	35x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	28x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16