To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 14.6%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive31.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20060712
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 01 '18 at 14:23
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 66%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Pentium D 3.40GHz
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
14.6% Very poor
SC Int 42
SC Float 28.2
SC Mixed 33.3
24% 34.5 Pts
QC Int 66.5
QC Float 42.9
QC Mixed 51.8
10% 53.7 Pts
MC Int 74.5
MC Float 47.6
MC Mixed 58.1
4% 60.1 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 17%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Patriot Burst 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM91.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 104 103 102 103 102 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.9% Below average
Read 114
Write 102
Mixed 91.7
SusWrite 102
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 26.9
4K Mixed 17
64% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 22.7
DQ Write 43.8
DQ Mixed 28
23% 31.5 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 87%
Quantum FIREBALLP AS20.5 21GB
12GB free
Firmware: A1Y.1500
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 25.7
Write 24.7
Mixed 21.7
SusWrite 13
16% 21.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
110% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 19%
WD WD800JB-00JJC0 80GB
49GB free
Firmware: 13.03G13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.2% Very poor
Read 25.4
Write 27.1
Mixed 23.7
SusWrite 13
17% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
155% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 32%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 32GB-$9
11GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 15 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
9.71% Terrible
Read 16.7
Write 12.7
Mixed 14.4
SusWrite 14.9
20% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.7
106% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 9.71%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
10.3% Very poor
MC Read 3.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 2.6
9% 3.07 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 3.5
SC Mixed 1.9
9% 3.1 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 22%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,718 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $40
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $350Nvidia GTX 1070 $400Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $127Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $250Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X $252Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $750Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $97
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $728SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $78SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback