Razer Blade Pro

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive185% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemRazer Blade Pro  (all builds)
MotherboardRazer Blade Pro
Memory12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 13:50
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (80th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Memory 86.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 214
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 360
8-Core 571
57% 466 Pts
64-Core 591
37% 591 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060 (Mobile)
Device(1A58 6758) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.1701
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
21.6% Poor
Lighting 10
Reflection 11.5
Parallax 51.6
8% 24.4 fps
MRender 63.6
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 59.2
48% 58.1 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLB256HAHQ-00000 256GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXD7201Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1117 330 299 302 303 304 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
185% Outstanding
Read 1,426
Write 1,156
Mixed 888
SusWrite 442
218% 978 MB/s
4K Read 50.2
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 65.8
217% 74.3 MB/s
DQ Read 872
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 737
551% 739 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 185%
Great: 249%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 131 130 140 139 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Read 113
Write 108
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 133
75% 102 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
184% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 70%
ASMT 2115 256GB
208GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 217 215 220 226 227 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
166% Outstanding
Read 245
Write 228
Mixed 230
SusWrite 219
313% 230 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 25.3
4K Mixed 22.5
1,702% 22.8 MB/s
DQ Read 22.4
DQ Write 26
DQ Mixed 23.8
1,777% 24.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 166%
Great: 225%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
75.5% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 30.1
MC Mixed 21.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 27.7
SC Mixed 23.1
64% 22.4 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 78%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Blade Pro Builds (Compare 294 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

System: Razer Blade Pro

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback