Asus H97M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 41%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H97M-E  (all builds)
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20160328
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 12:26
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790-$135
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 103
2-Core 195
75% 129 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 454
47% 378 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
ASRock(1849 5001) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1380 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.3.4
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.8% Above average
Lighting 63.8
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 79.8
52% 71.1 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 63.1
Splatting 57
51% 63.6 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 480GB
186GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 284 281 283 264 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
93.4% Outstanding
Read 814
Write 584
Mixed 229
SusWrite 274
105% 475 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 17.8
76% 28.6 MB/s
DQ Read 405
DQ Write 553
DQ Mixed 26.1
146% 328 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 93.4%
Great: 182%
Crucial M500 240GB-$54
168GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 155 162 155 156 163 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.6% Below average
Read 183
Write 164
Mixed 130
SusWrite 159
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 14.8
4K Write 28.3
4K Mixed 17.1
59% 20.1 MB/s
DQ Read 99.9
DQ Write 40.4
DQ Mixed 24.3
30% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 91%
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2018)-$37
171GB free
Firmware: 1011 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 512 479 493 468 473 495 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 486
Write 514
Mixed 498
SusWrite 486
112% 496 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 48.4
187% 75.8 MB/s
DQ Read 720
DQ Write 628
DQ Mixed 65.9
216% 471 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 136%
Great: 284%
Toshiba MG05ACA800E 8TB
5TB free
Firmware: GX4K
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 89 94 91 87 100 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
61.2% Good
Read 119
Write 142
Mixed 63.8
SusWrite 93.9
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 0.3
116% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.2%
Great: 133%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Team-Elite-1600 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (25th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
52% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 15.1
51% 17.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.3
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H97M-E Builds (Compare 2,533 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H97M-E - $99

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $277
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback