Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics25.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A99X EVO R2.0  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140403
Uptime8.3 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 07:53
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6350 Six-Core-$100
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
53.9% Above average
Memory 69.5
1-Core 67.3
2-Core 126
53% 87.7 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 265
31% 240 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 53.9%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950-$100
Asus(1043 858D) 2GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1652 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 416.94
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.4% Poor
Lighting 31
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 28.2
25% 30 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 28.8
Splatting 29.3
26% 31.7 fps
Poor: 22%
This bench: 25.4%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
416GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 113 123 123 125 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 143
Mixed 69.5
SusWrite 115
87% 120 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
226% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 500GB-$80
465GB free
Firmware: SD35
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 107 107 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 101
Write 13.3
Mixed 49.3
SusWrite 107
50% 67.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 59%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$24
465GB free
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 141 141 142 142 141 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 144
Write 146
Mixed 67
SusWrite 141
91% 125 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz clocked @ 533 MHz
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
MC Read 6.6
MC Write 6.2
MC Mixed 5.8
18% 6.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 4.5
SC Mixed 4
12% 4.23 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A99X EVO R2.0 Builds (Compare 753 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus M5A99X EVO R2.0 - $300

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $729
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback