Alienware Aurora

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlienware Aurora  (all builds)
MotherboardAlienware 04VWF2
Memory7 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100427
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateNov 30 '18 at 06:38
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 480 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
65% Good
Memory 92.4
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 122
60% 94.2 Pts
4-Core 206
8-Core 317
32% 261 Pts
64-Core 308
19% 308 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 65%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 480-$75
CLim: 1288 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 17.1.1
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34.7% Below average
Lighting 39.3
Reflection 63.1
Parallax 58.3
32% 53.6 fps
MRender 64.9
Gravity 29
Splatting 52.5
40% 48.8 fps
Poor: 35%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 53%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 197 226 215 184 180 176 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.1% Good
Read 245
Write 233
Mixed 218
SusWrite 196
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 53.6
4K Mixed 36.5
109% 37.4 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 192
DQ Mixed 198
149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 134%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
414GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 186 182 182 186 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
115% Outstanding
Read 215
Write 201
Mixed 54.8
SusWrite 184
118% 164 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 1.4
265% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 115%
Great: 184%
WD My Passport 0837 1TB
152GB free, PID 0837
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 24 27 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
15.8% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 25.9
35% 26.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 15.8%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 10GB
null MHz
2048, 1024, 2048, 1024, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
48.6% Average
MC Read 17.7
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 18.3
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.9
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 12.2
32% 11.2 GB/s
Latency 63.4
63% 63.4 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aurora Builds (Compare 504 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: Alienware Aurora

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $249
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback