PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 62.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 33.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
Motherboard | Asus P5Q-PRO (all builds) |
Memory | 4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8 |
BIOS Date | 20090223 |
Uptime | 13.4 Days |
Run Date | Nov 29 '18 at 22:21 |
Run Duration | 172 Seconds |
Run User | MDA-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$161
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
|
45.5%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 390.77
|
62.1%
Good
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HyperX Savage 240GB-$120
26GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SAFM00.r
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 38 54 33 50 40 MB/s
|
33.4%
Below average
|
|||
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
66GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 56 70 71 76 67 MB/s
|
49.7%
Average
|
|||
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
74GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 39 54 34 50 39 MB/s
|
27.8%
Poor
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
80GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 56 70 71 76 67 MB/s
|
34%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
|
21.5%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q9550Intel $161Bench 49%, 34,093 samples | 79x |
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 32x |
Core2 Duo E8500Intel $110Bench 42%, 18,841 samples | 28x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 4870ATIBench 9%, 22,563 samples | 26x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 13x |
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 12x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 52% - Above average | Total price: $189 |