Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 54%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive94.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180705
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateNov 29 '18 at 16:31
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8086K-$399
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Memory 97.1
1-Core 128
2-Core 247
89% 157 Pts
4-Core 428
8-Core 843
75% 636 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.1
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
60.3% Good
Lighting 75.5
Reflection 77.3
Parallax 67.3
62% 73.3 fps
MRender 70.6
Gravity 70.8
Splatting 70.8
58% 70.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 128GB-$150
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM05B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 329 320 294 264 260 252 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
94.6% Outstanding
Read 448
Write 347
Mixed 275
SusWrite 287
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 32.7
4K Write 97.4
4K Mixed 37.4
149% 55.8 MB/s
DQ Read 311
DQ Write 310
DQ Mixed 116
141% 246 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 94.6%
Great: 110%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
1TB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 138 140 140 139 140 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76.4% Very good
Read 127
Write 116
Mixed 114
SusWrite 139
92% 124 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1
199% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 76.4%
Great: 85%
Intenso Ultra Line 32GB
29GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 37 37 37 37 37 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
27.7% Poor
Read 112
Write 39.7
Mixed 72.3
SusWrite 37.3
78% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.1
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 1.3
87% 2.07 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 27.7%
Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMW16GX4M2K4000C19 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
41.4% Average
MC Read 13
MC Write 13.5
MC Mixed 12.6
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 12.8
36% 12.7 GB/s
Latency 50
80% 50 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 41.4%
Great: 129%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming 7 Builds (Compare 3,954 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 Aorus Gaming 7 - $221

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $1,049
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback