QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 33% Sail boat	Desktop 62% Destroyer	Workstation 26% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	56.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory	16.3 GB free of 20 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150206
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 29 '18 at 01:31
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	23%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8320 Eight-Core 43 User benchmarks, average bench 52% CPU 0, 1 CPU, 7 cores, 7 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	57.9% Above average	Memory 79.4 1-Core 57 2-Core 106 51% 80.8 Pts	4-Core 199 8-Core 337 32% 268 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 57.9% Great: 67%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% PNY(196E 11A0) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.34 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	56.9% Above average	Lighting 61.8 Reflection 75.1 Parallax 71.2 50% 69.3 fps	MRender 83.2 Gravity 85.6 Splatting 85.4 70% 84.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 56.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 250GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 65% 51GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 189 190 198 211 201 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 21% Great: 99%
Red Hat VirtIO 268GB 49 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 232GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 318 315 344 374 371 354 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 23% Great: 81%
Red Hat VirtIO 3TB 46 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 352GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 150 152 158 166 164 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	98.2% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 142 Mixed 84 SusWrite 155 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 98.2% Great: 112%
General UDisk 16GB 4,718 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 15GB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 4.3 4.4 4.1 3.6 4.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.93% Terrible	Read 2.7 Write 0.2 Mixed 1.7 SusWrite 3.9 3% 2.12 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 11% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 1.93% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
QEMU 20GB 285 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 0, 0 MHz 16384, 4096 MB Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	47.1% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 14.8 MC Mixed 17.4 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 8.8 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 12.3 28% 9.83 GB/s	Latency 81.7 49% 81.7 ns
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 125%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 606 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 83%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 74%

Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

CPU
KVM processorCommonBench 64%, 2,228 samples	42x
Ryzen 7 3700X 8-CoreAMDBench 76%, 455 samples	20x
Ryzen 9 5950X 16-CoreAMDBench 94%, 174 samples	13x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	37x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	29x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	28x

SSD
HARDDISK 2TBQemuBench 65%, 24 samples	19x
HARDDISK 500GBQemuBench 59%, 94 samples	18x
980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $94Bench 251%, 262,559 samples	16x

RAM
1x16GBQEMUBench 91%, 3,887 samples	139x
1x8GBQEMUBench 78%, 5,342 samples	73x
1x12GBQEMUBench 78%, 4,175 samples	66x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 60% - Good

Total price: $485

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16