| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Biostar H61MHB (all builds) |
| Memory | 6.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20111220 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 28 '18 at 21:26 |
| Run Duration | 105 Seconds |
| Run User | CAN-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
82.6%
Excellent
|
80% 138 Pts
|
58% 453 Pts
|
32% 518 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 560 Ti-$188
EVGA(3842 1561) 1GB
CLim: 850 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
17% 21.2 fps
|
19% 23.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
411GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 102 109 110 114 109 MB/s
|
61.6%
Good
|
73% 99 MB/s
|
187% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 2 MHz
Performing below potential (97th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
35%
Below average
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
32% 11.3 GB/s
|
69% 57.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H61MHB Builds (Compare 71 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Biostar H61MHB
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 9x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 6x |
| Core i5-3330IntelBench 61%, 51,926 samples | 6x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 16x |
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 9x |
| GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 74% - Very good | Total price: $79 |