Performance Results


Gaming 134% UFO	Desktop 92% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	154% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	109% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180 588,978 User benchmarks, average bench 81% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 91.2 1-Core 132 2-Core 250 89% 158 Pts	4-Core 460 8-Core 669 70% 564 Pts	64-Core 679 42% 679 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 90%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441 357,946 User benchmarks, average bench 156% Nvidia(10DE 1E07) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 416.94 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	154% Outstanding	Lighting 211 Reflection 222 Parallax 231 172% 222 fps	MRender 247 Gravity 214 Splatting 139 157% 200 fps
Poor: 128% ↑ This bench: 154% Great: 174%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$190 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 367GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 424 443 459 460 452 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 473 Write 447 Mixed 391 SusWrite 440 99% 438 MB/s	4K Read 32.4 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 43.9 150% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 356 269% 361 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
Samsung 860 Evo 2TB-$275 44,466 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 399GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 179 175 187 187 187 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	87.7% Excellent	Read 486 Write 199 Mixed 250 SusWrite 194 62% 282 MB/s	4K Read 29.6 4K Write 93.4 4K Mixed 38.2 143% 53.7 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 196 168% 252 MB/s
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 87.7% Great: 133%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 437GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 70 72 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	33.1% Below average	Read 44.7 Write 41.5 Mixed 32.2 SusWrite 70.2 35% 47.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 139% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 33.1% Great: 51%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2800 C14 4x4GB 1,174 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	73.9% Very good	MC Read 26.2 MC Write 28.7 MC Mixed 22.8 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 17.4 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 22.9 66% 23 GB/s	Latency 65.4 61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 73.9% Great: 113%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 86%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

SSD
950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $625Bench 223%, 54,978 samples	68x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	49x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	46x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	53x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	49x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	24x

Value: 44% - Average

Total price: $1,567

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16