Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics29.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus STRIX Z270E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170322
Uptime2.8 Days
Run DateNov 27 '18 at 22:45
Run Duration181 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$230
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
98.8% Outstanding
Memory 93
1-Core 143
2-Core 287
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 565
8-Core 797
86% 681 Pts
64-Core 792
49% 792 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 98.8%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.94
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.4% Poor
Lighting 33.2
Reflection 38.3
Parallax 31.2
27% 34.2 fps
MRender 47.5
Gravity 33.2
Splatting 43.3
34% 41.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 29.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 1TB
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSBG200
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 483
Write 461
Mixed 395
100% 446 MB/s
4K Read 30.2
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 46.4
164% 62.8 MB/s
DQ Read 29.9
DQ Write 124
DQ Mixed 47.7
45% 67.2 MB/s
Poor: 61% Great: 96%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 500GB
56GB free
Firmware: EMT21B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 480 491 494 495 412 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
133% Outstanding
Read 508
Write 494
Mixed 402
SusWrite 470
106% 468 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 67.9
227% 80.4 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 69.6
113% 213 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 133%
Great: 131%
WD Black 5TB (2015)-$71
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 160 162 162 161 160 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Read 110
Write 195
Mixed 106
SusWrite 162
106% 143 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.2
4K Mixed 0.9
338% 2.8 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 107%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
40GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 59 61 60 59 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.7% Below average
Read 57
Write 56
Mixed 57.7
SusWrite 60.1
43% 57.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
41GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 59 61 60 59 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 56.5
Write 51
Mixed 30.2
SusWrite 59.7
36% 49.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
133% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 67%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
73GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 92 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
56% Above average
Read 103
Write 99.8
Mixed 66
SusWrite 91.8
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
160% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 56%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 2x8GB-$31
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.3% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 26
MC Mixed 19.4
68% 23.6 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 21.5
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 62.2
64% 62.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical STRIX Z270E GAMING Builds (Compare 6,556 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 76%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asus STRIX Z270E GAMING - $199

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $966
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback