Performance Results


Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 78% Battleship	Workstation 14% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	11.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	85.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3 10,197 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA2011-3 SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Memory 91.3 1-Core 101 2-Core 208 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 389 8-Core 544 59% 466 Pts	64-Core 548 34% 548 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K620-$170 16,214 User benchmarks, average bench 11% Nvidia(10DE 1098) 2GB CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 390.77 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	11.9% Very poor	Lighting 15 Reflection 14.1 Parallax 10.8 12% 13.3 fps	MRender 11.3 Gravity 13.5 Splatting 15.5 11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.9% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 698GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 336 362 340 311 167 121 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	85.9% Excellent	Read 417 Write 390 Mixed 316 SusWrite 273 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 25.6 4K Write 84.6 4K Mixed 32.6 125% 47.6 MB/s	DQ Read 350 DQ Write 292 DQ Mixed 267 214% 303 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 85.9% Great: 133%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 2TB-$50 94,145 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 1TB free Firmware: CC62 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 86 72 60 59 61 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	64.8% Good	Read 151 Write 102 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 73.4 67% 92 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 1.4 292% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 64.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMA41GR7MFR4N-TF 2x8GB 912 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 2 of 8 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	62% Good	MC Read 25.6 MC Write 20.4 MC Mixed 20.6 63% 22.2 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 13.8 SC Mixed 18 45% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 65.3 61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 62% Great: 67%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16