| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 58.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (29%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-PLUS (all builds) |
| Memory | 9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161227 |
| Uptime | 1.5 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 26 '18 at 22:47 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 29% |
PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
79.1%
Very good
|
79% 140 Pts
|
65% 526 Pts
|
41% 666 Pts
|
| Graphics Cards | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Nvidia(10DE 11D7) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 416.94
|
58.6%
Above average
|
60% 73.1 fps
|
56% 68.1 fps
| |
|
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
|
7.28%
Terrible
|
7% 9.12 fps
|
9% 9.79 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata Ultimate SU800 256GB-$54
143GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1021A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 77 84 54 61 69 MB/s
|
55.9%
Above average
|
40% 183 MB/s
|
86% 26.6 MB/s
|
100% 138 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba P300 1TB-$67
234GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 130 125 123 108 130 MB/s
|
77%
Very good
|
78% 109 MB/s
|
168% 1.27 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR4 2133 C15 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
36.7%
Below average
|
35% 12.4 GB/s
|
30% 10.3 GB/s
|
52% 77.5 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-PLUS Builds (Compare 620 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-PLUS
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 146x |
| Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 130x |
| Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 97x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 120x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 86x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 55x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $337 |