Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results


Gaming 75% Battleship	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 76% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (82nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 18 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	83.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	182% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 (all builds)
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180315
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '18 at 13:23
Run Duration	176 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	82.4% Excellent	Memory 77.9 1-Core 117 2-Core 235 79% 143 Pts	4-Core 465 8-Core 888 80% 677 Pts	64-Core 1,274 79% 1,274 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 82.4% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% EVGA(3842 6171) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2144 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 416.81 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	83.7% Excellent	Lighting 103 Reflection 113 Parallax 106 84% 108 fps	MRender 103 Gravity 98.6 Splatting 101 83% 101 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 83.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB 99,566 User benchmarks, average bench 177% 174GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXB7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 476 323 320 317 318 320 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	182% Outstanding	Read 1,935 Write 1,227 Mixed 802 SusWrite 346 238% 1,077 MB/s	4K Read 52.9 4K Write 108 4K Mixed 68.5 225% 76.4 MB/s	DQ Read 427 DQ Write 179 DQ Mixed 61.3 109% 222 MB/s
Poor: 106% ↑ This bench: 182% Great: 236%
Addlink S10 256GB 63 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 120GB free Firmware: SBFM71.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 326 62 62 62 63 62 MB/s Performing below potential (42^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.4% Good	Read 212 Write 114 Mixed 270 SusWrite 106 39% 176 MB/s	4K Read 28 4K Write 75.6 4K Mixed 29.3 120% 44.3 MB/s	DQ Read 256 DQ Write 331 DQ Mixed 52.8 107% 213 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 918GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 185 188 189 188 184 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Read 186 Write 177 Mixed 103 SusWrite 187 120% 163 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.3 258% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 931GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 183 186 187 188 186 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	108% Outstanding	Read 189 Write 178 Mixed 121 SusWrite 186 124% 169 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 1.2 239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 108% Great: 109%
Lexar USB Flash Drive 16GB 7,719 User benchmarks, average bench 7% 15GB free, PID a81d Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.3 16 16 14 18 18 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	8.62% Terrible	Read 25.9 Write 3.7 Mixed 7.8 SusWrite 14.5 15% 13 MB/s	4K Read 7.2 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 27% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 8.62% Great: 9%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata DDR4 2666 2OZ 4x4GB 147 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 40.8 MC Write 37.4 MC Mixed 34.9 108% 37.7 GB/s	SC Read 25.4 SC Write 40.2 SC Mixed 31.4 92% 32.3 GB/s	Latency 84.5 47% 84.5 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 524 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 79%

Battleship

Workstation 77%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

CPU
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	96x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	69x
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	67x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	57x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	29x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	21x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	17x

RAM
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	20x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	18x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

Feedback

PC Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)