Asus CG5290

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics43.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus CG5290  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090511
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateNov 26 '18 at 08:34
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-920-$90
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
60.6% Good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 62.2
2-Core 106
54% 84.4 Pts
4-Core 200
8-Core 288
30% 244 Pts
64-Core 331
20% 331 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 60.6%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 390-$325
CLim: 1010 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 18.8.1
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
43.2% Average
Lighting 45.9
Reflection 61.2
Parallax 82.2
37% 63.1 fps
MRender 61
Gravity 54.9
Splatting 78.8
54% 64.9 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 43.2%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ AGILITY4 128GB
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.4.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 56.5
Write 58.5
Mixed 64.3
13% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 11.6
4K Write 39.2
4K Mixed 16.9
60% 22.6 MB/s
DQ Read 19
DQ Write 69.2
DQ Mixed 18.3
22% 35.5 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 81%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$497
193GB free
Firmware: ST6OA31B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 37 36 36 30 36 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
30.8% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 77
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 33.3
39% 53.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
108% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.8%
Great: 61%
WD WD3200KS-00PFB0 320GB
78GB free
Firmware: 21.00M21
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 37 36 36 32 35 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
Read 19
Write 30
Mixed 26.5
SusWrite 33.5
20% 27.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 36%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
31GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 67 63 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
38.6% Below average
Read 68.8
Write 62
Mixed 50.3
SusWrite 65.5
46% 61.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 38.6%
Great: 69%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
562GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 114 113 110 116 116 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 83.3
Write 76.5
Mixed 25.5
SusWrite 112
54% 74.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 1.9
330% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 24GB
null MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.5% Below average
MC Read 11.5
MC Write 11.6
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.83 GB/s
Latency 72.4
55% 72.4 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 72%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical CG5290 Builds (Compare 42 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus CG5290

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $377
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback