Asus H110M-CS/BR

Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 18% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	32% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	28.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus H110M-CS/BR (all builds)
Memory	3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170705
Uptime	0.2 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '18 at 06:45
Run Duration	173 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	34%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-7400-$95 234,266 User benchmarks, average bench 64% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	62.3% Good	Memory 71.4 1-Core 99 2-Core 179 67% 117 Pts	4-Core 305 8-Core 324 42% 315 Pts	64-Core 366 23% 366 Pts
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 62.3% Great: 73%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Asus(1043 8603) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	32% Below average	Lighting 40.6 Reflection 31.1 Parallax 34.3 33% 35.3 fps	MRender 34.7 Gravity 38.9 Splatting 35.5 30% 36.4 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 166GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 130 138 153 144 153 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	28.6% Poor	Read 178 Write 90.8 Mixed 84.8 SusWrite 142 28% 124 MB/s	4K Read 12.1 4K Write 18.5 4K Mixed 9.3 40% 13.3 MB/s	DQ Read 14.9 DQ Write 15.8 DQ Mixed 14.7 11% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 28.6% Great: 100%
WD Green 240GB (2016) 20,831 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 25GB free Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 23 31 25 33 28 21 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 34% Great: 70%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 177GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 26 31 25 18 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	7.85% Terrible	Read 5 Write 8 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 22.4 7% 9.98 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 13% 0.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 7.85% Great: 69%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB 60,539 User benchmarks, average bench 11% 11GB free, PID 5567 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.3 6.4 8.7 8.4 8.7 8.6 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	13.9% Very poor	Read 35.2 Write 5.5 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 7.3 19% 17 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 3 185% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 17%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSC.16FBD2 1x8GB 2,457 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 1 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	35.4% Below average	MC Read 12.1 MC Write 12.6 MC Mixed 11.4 34% 12 GB/s	SC Read 9.9 SC Write 12.8 SC Mixed 10.4 32% 11 GB/s	Latency 98.2 41% 98.2 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 48%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H110M-CS/BR Builds (Compare 660 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 37%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus H110M-CS/BR

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples	251x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	99x
Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples	90x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	131x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	96x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples	46x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	90x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	42x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	37x

RAM
HyperX 2400 C15 1x8GBKingstonBench 40%, 46,352 samples	19x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x4GBHyperX $67Bench 69%, 46,617 samples	16x
9905678-102.A00G 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 1,046 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 92% - Outstanding

Total price: $240

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16