Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus Crosshair V Formula (all builds)
Memory	1.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20120312
Uptime	8.8 Days
Run Date	Nov 26 '18 at 00:50
Run Duration	86 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 975 1,372 User benchmarks, average bench 57% AM3r2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 80.5 1-Core 47.5 2-Core 83.6 47% 70.5 Pts	4-Core 121 8-Core 127 16% 124 Pts	64-Core 106 6% 106 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 64%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 380X-$120 20,573 User benchmarks, average bench 38% XFX(1682 9385) CLim: 1040 MHz, MLim: 1450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 18.10.1 Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	30.8% Below average	Lighting 39.6 Reflection 40 Parallax 48.7 32% 42.7 fps	MRender 40.3 Gravity 35.4 Splatting 28.7 28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 40%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 0GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 275 Write 82.2 Mixed 87 32% 148 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 59.5 4K Mixed 26.7 100% 36.3 MB/s	DQ Read 266 DQ Write 77 DQ Mixed 102 93% 148 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 8GB 82,857 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)	29.5% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 7.2 MC Mixed 11.7 29% 10.1 GB/s	SC Read 5.2 SC Write 5.4 SC Mixed 8.4 18% 6.33 GB/s	Latency 79.6 50% 79.6 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 29.5% Great: 51%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 32%

Sail boat

Desktop 68%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 26%

Raft

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $680

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16